That was my original thread, but as it turns out, a slightly choppy video output is the same with every video editor I try! I must restate- the original. For vegas or potentially another program?
Really hoping that someone with experience could point me towards the correct rendering settings. I've tried a whole host of different rendering/project settings but I just can't seem to find the magic numbers to make it render a perfectly good OBS recorded. This is the mode you should normally use.I've found a good balance for quality in my stream/recording in OBS, but when I render the file in Vegas (minor audio/video cuts) the quality always dips noticeably.
In practice, this results in smaller files than using Constant Quantizer mode, but at similar visual quality. Some frames might be encoded with a slightly higher quantizer, and some with a slightly lower quantizer (VBR). Rather than encode every frame to the same quantizer, this mode allows for a bit of variation. You shouldn't use this mode unless you have a specific reason for doing so.Ĭonstant Quality: The constant quality mode works similarly to the constant quantizer mode, but it is MUCH better. Because this mode encodes every single frame at the same quantizer, it typically results in rather inefficient encodes. Lower quantizers will result in less detail being lost, but the filesizes will be larger, and higher quantizers mean more detail will be lost, but filesizes will be lower. In simple terms, the quantizer determines how much detail is removed from the image. It appears that none of these setting:Ĭonstant Quantizer: This mode works by encoding every frame of the video at a particular quantizer. The compression type I'm looking for is VBR. This is a copy of the help file from XMedia Recode.
#Xmedia recode constant quality setting movie
I'm just a newbie when it comes to movie encoding. While the value of 100 is probably too high because it does not significantly improve the quality, but increase the file size significantly.
A smaller number results in higher quality and larger files (a higher bit rate results in less compression). The constant quantization affects the macroblock quantization value, so to speak, the "compression" of the macro block. As can also occur here bottlenecks similar to CBR and the bit rate within the file remains relatively close to the average bitrate, VBR mode offers a higher quality.ĪBR is only interesting if a certain file size must be achieved, otherwise one should use in the interest of quality VBR. The aim is the average bit rate of a track as close as possible to stick to a predetermined size. This mode is a kind of mixture of both, and is high in the middle. I've been using 2 pass Average Bitrate but would much prefer to use VBR 2 pass.Īm I doing something wrong? Can anyone shed an light on this for me please, I thought that using H.264 should give me this option. However, there does not seem to be an option for VBR for H.264 (MKV). Has some great features such as cropping, cutting, inserting chapters, direct copy, audio/video sync, pause, just to name a few. I found that XMedia Recode suits me the best at the moment - to convert Blu-ray TS movies to MKV - H.264. Tried just about every combination of settings to know avail. Handbrake and Media Coder (using High/advanced settings) converts won't play on my Blu-ray player.
#Xmedia recode constant quality setting full
So far I've found that the commercial ones find it difficult to produce a full HD movie at a very small size with excellent quality. I've tried just about every commercial video encoder on the net.
0 kommentar(er)
